Comments posted in response to Guardian editorial: Nuclear power: A bung
by any other name |
Nuclear power demands BIG BUSINESS and BIG GOVERNMENT,
towards whose interests the state is inherently and massively biased. So, it
looks at the moment as if there is no way of avoiding a repeat of the nuclear
madness and tragedy which gripped us in the 1950's and 60'.
With a tear in my eye, I sometime imagine our situation if all the money spent
on nuclear energy in the past (or even just a fraction of it) had been spent
instead on energy conservation and renewables, which would have been the wise
and enlightened thing to do, as pointed out by people like E. F. Schumacher in
his book "Small is Beautiful".
What more evidence do we need to affirm that back in the 18th century
biological science tragically, because so misleadingly, misnamed our species,
Homo sapiens (rational man), when what we should really be called is
Homo stupidus economicus, or perhaps, from a Darwinian perspective (which
wasn't available in the 18th century), "Homo darwini" (Darwinian man),
to indicate how we are still dominated by the primordial struggle for
survival, advantage (over others) and "success", only now misplaced and
perverted in the artificial environment of civilization itself, which,
notwithstanding its many achievements, arose and developed for the purpose of
facilitating society's self-exploitation to the advantage of its dominant
individuals and elites, but which our large and prodigious brain successfully
rationalizes and blinds us to.