To:    Everyone
Re:    The melting pot ends here! But opponents of multicultural society are "enemies of the state"
Date: Monday 30 October 06

If I had children, I'd like to send them to a kindergarten and then to a school with the motto, "The "melting pot" ends here!", i.e. a kindergarten and school for native (ethnic European) children.

You only need to substitute "white" for "native", of course, and the last part of the above sentence immediately becomes blatantly and indisputably "racist", thus illustrating current, not entirely unintended, misconceptions about the meaning and importance of skin colour and race.

Skin colour is, generally speaking, a genetic marker relating to an individual's "origins" (who their ancestors are - where they came from, their history, culture etc.). If that is not important, I don't know what is. To me - and I'm sure, to a great many other people, of all races, as well - it is a central and essential part of my identity (who I am, where I come from, and where I belong).

Is it really so unreasonable - i.e. "racist" - for me to want my children to attend a school where the other children are, perhaps not exclusively, but predominantly, of the same ethnicity, with the same (closely related) ancestors, history and culture? Is it unreasonable  - i.e. "racist" - for me to want to retain my ethnic, cultural and historical identity as a native European and see it passed on to my descendents?

I do not believe so - but the way things stand at the moment, that makes me a "racist". Even though I'm not.

The British state (partly in response to the criminally insane racial ideology of the Nazi state) is not alone in having chosen to identify itself with the "melting pot" of multi-racial/multi-cultural society, in which a certain amount of ethnic identification and solidarity amongst newly arrived immigrant minorities is tolerated (even encouraged), but amongst the native population is strictly forbidden and condemned as "racism".

Anyone who is against the "melting pot" of multi-racial/multicultural society is thus an "enemy of the state". This is why someone who objects to, or even questions, it is condemned as a "racist". It is like calling your enemy a "terrorist". You don't negotiate, try to reason or debate with "racists" or "terrorists", but simply dismiss them and their cause as diabolical and attempt to suppress or destroy them.

And we think of ourselves as such an enlightened, free, and civilized society. We need to think again.