To: Electronic Telegraph
<et.letters@telegraph.co.uk> |
Dear
Sir/Madam, The question
of the veracity of the
virgin birth is of
fundamental
importance, because if
this particular
miracle isn’t to be
believed, why should
any of the other
miracles related in
the Bible be believed
either? And if these
are not to be
believed, especially
those relating to
Jesus’s divinity,
his sacrificial death
for the redemption of
our sins, and his
resurrection from the
dead, then the whole
theological foundation
of Christianity is
destroyed (Quarter
of clergy do not
believe in the Virgin
Birth, 22 December
2002). You quote one vicar as saying that writers at the time used to stress a person's importance by ‘making up stories’ about their early life. That is putting it very tactfully. Put more bluntly, what he is saying is that they told lies. The “Gospel Truth” it seems is the “Gospel Lie”! To claim that
the veracity of the
Gospels, of which
miracles are an essential
part, is not
important is nonsense,
except perhaps for the
vicar who doesn’t
want to lose his job. On the
contrary, it is very
important - because of
the extent to which
Christianity permeates
our history and
culture and still
contributes much to
what we are. It is
also important because
of the spiritual
vacuum its demise
leaves behind - a
vacuum that Islam,
which doesn’t make
such absurd claims for
its founder, is only too eager to fill. Not all, but
much of what is
written in the Bible
is manifestly nonsense. It
contains some wisdom,
of course, and is of
great historical and
literary value. But as
a source of knowledge,
spiritual inspiration
and moral guidance in
the modern world, it
is "holy"
inadequate. We need to
face up to this, so
that we can replace it
and fill the vacuum
(the cause of most our
social ills) with something better,
something far less
dogmatic and much more
rational. How about a Religion
and Philosophy of
Sustainability,
which while not
promising us a life in
the hereafter, may at
least offer hope
for our children and
coming generations here on Earth . .
. ? |