Observations on the generation,
composition, and decomposition
of animal and vegetable substances 1748 Turbevill Needham
. . . FOR MY PURPOSE, THEREFORE, I took a Quantity of Mutton-Gravy hot
from the Fire, and shut it up in a phial, clos'd up with a Cork so well
masticateds that my Precautions amounted to as much as if I had sealed
my Phial hermetically. I thus eflfectually excluded the exterior Air, that
it might not be said my moving Bodies drew their Origin from Insects, or
Eggs floating in the Atmosphere.... I neglected no Precaution, even as
far as to heat violently in hot Ashes tht Body of the Phial, that if any
thing existed, even in that little portion of Air which filled up the Neck,
it might be destroyed, and lose its productive Faculty. Nothing therefore
could answer my Purpose of excluding everv Objection, better than hot roast-Meat
Gravy secured in this manner, and exposed some Davs to the SummerHeat:
and as I determined not to open it, till I might reasonably conclude, whether,
by its own Principles, it was productive of any thing, I allow'd sufficient
Time for that Purpose to this pure unmix'd Quintessence, if I may so call
it, of an animal body.... My Phial swarm'd with Life, and microscopical
Animals of most Dimensions, from some of the largest I had ever seen, to
some of the least. The very first Drop I used, upon opening it, yielded
me Multitudes perfectly form'd, animated, and spontaneous in all their
Motions:
Comment by Thomas Brock This selection of Needham's is typical of the thinking of the proponents of spontaneous generation. The crucial experimental points are whether or not the -to keep any living things out of the vial after the heating of the vial in hot ashes was really sufficient to destroy all living things within, and whether the cork was able to keep any living things out of the vial after heating. Spallanzani deals with both of these problems in the next article, and in so far as it was possible with 18th century techniques, solves them. |