To:
dtletters@telegraph.co.uk |
|||
Dear
Editor,
What
a load of
superficial
piffle you
publish in
today's
Telegraph:
Anthony King
on "What
does it mean
to be British?";
WF Deedes on
"British
and proud";
Alice Thomson
on "Desire
to sing Land
of Hope and
Glory"
and finally
your leader on
"Core
British values".
They
are like a
bunch of 5th
Century Romans
discussing
what it means
to be
"Roman"
(notwithstanding
Rome's great
past
achievements).
The
interesting
question is,
what will take
its place?
Personally,
I feel more
ethnic
European, with
a history that
goes back more
than two and a
half thousand
years (not to
mention the
millennia of
European
prehistory),
than
multi-racial
British, with
a history
which goes
back just a
few decades,
and with which
I simply do
not identify.
I'm sorry, but
I'd rather see
a white
Australian,
American or
German win an
Olympic medal
than a Black
or Asian
Briton.
Because
that
undermines a
sense of
national (or
ideological)
identity,
which you and
others wish to
cultivate,
such an
attitude is
dismissed and
condemned as
"racist";
but I
disagree. It
is simply the
way that I
(and probably
a lot of other
people, of all
races, if they
are honest)
feel.
|
|||
|