From: Roger Hicks
Roger.Hicks@spaceship-earth.de
Re: High tech surveillance: We don't need ID cards - we need finger or eye scans linked to a government databank
Date: 11 October 2001
 
Return to letter

Return to index


SIR - Philip Johnston has convinced me that ID-cards, which may have made sense 50 years ago, are not the way to combat 21st century terrorism [The case for and against identity cards, 25 September 2001]

What is required is a completely reliable method of identifying anyone on the spot, for example when they wish to board a plane.

State of the art technology, using finger or eye scans and matching them with an ID-file in a government databank, provides the solution.

This means doing away with, a citizen's right to remain anonymous, but it is a small price to pay for reducing to a minimum the risk of terrorist attack like the ones America suffered on 11 September, or possibly even worse.

I do not understand why anonymity is so important to some people or why they equate it with civil liberty. It is not as if an individual's ID-file will be freely available on the internet, or to anybody at all other than a democratically controlled security service with very secure procedures to prevent misuse.

The next time I get on a plane, I want to be sure that no madman, protected by his right to remain anonymous, is getting on with me.