To: Electronic Telegraph <et.letters@telegraph.co.uk>
Re: Scientific motivations Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2000 |
||
Published version | ||
Dear Sir, So, Dr James Watson thinks that "basically people don't like science", and that Prince Charles, because he criticises GM crops, is one of them (Prince's GM 'superstition' attacked by Nobel winner). What I do not like - and I suspect that Prince Charles and many others feel the same - are arrogant scientists, like Dr Watson, who having discovered one of the keys to nature's palace of wonders, instead of being filled with awe and respect, are mainly concerned with exploiting what they find to advance their careers and standing in society. Being myself a biologist and lover of science, I have nothing against
genetic engineering in itself, nor against its well-considered application.
What I object to and warn against is its ill-considered
We need to learn from the terrible mistake we made with nuclear energy,
which not so long ago nuclear scientists and their supporters assured us
was the ideal solution to mankind's energy problems. In their enthusiasm
- and arrogance - they grossly underestimated the dangers, so that
Most modern scientists, far from being disinterested pursuers of knowledge
and understanding, are - like most mortals - mainly interested in keeping
their jobs and advancing their careers. In a society
They would serve society better if, instead, they were to cultivate a sense of awe and wonder for the revelations of modern science (in themselves and in society at large), and an appreciation for both the intellectual and material benefits they have brought us. If they had the humility to listen, scientists have much to learn from
Prince Charles and his attitude to GM crops.
|