To:
politics.editor@guardianunlimited.co.uk Date: Monday 8 November 04 |
||
|
||
Dear Sir/Madam,
"Praise for 'green Queen", one reads in last Thursday's Guardian, from which one might deduce that if only we were all as aware and concerned for the environment as her Majesty, the world would be saved. I do not doubt the Queen's sincerity, but she and we are deluding ourselves, because the values and attitudes which determine her lifestyle, and which millions, if not billions, of others seek to emulate, are anything but sustainable. Everyone
has heard about "the
straw that broke the camel's
back " - and perhaps
wondered, "whose straw
was to blame?" Paradoxically the answer is, "no one's and everyone's".
But
that is assuming, of course,
that each person placed just a
single, or the same number of
straws on the camel's back. The
answer is rather different if
some people place more straws
on its back than others.
Let the camel represent Earth's finite carrying capacity, on which each of us has to place a certain number of straws in order to live. Although we do not know exactly how many it can carry, we can be sure that there is a limit - which will be exceeded if increasing numbers of people continue to pile on more and more straws.
Insanely,
this is exactly what we are
doing. Everyone can pile as
many straws onto the camel's
back as they have - or can
borrow - the money to pay for,
and are encouraged to do so,
not just by their natural
inclinations, but also by a
growth-dependent economy and
multibillion dollar credit and
advertising industries.
That may take a while to sink in, because it is difficult recognising the "insanities of normality", which we have all grown up with, especially when so much (income, lifestyle, aspirations, etc.) depends on them.
We urgently need a rough, working definition of what constitutes a "straw" and an estimate of how many the camel's back (our planet) can support, because we don't want to go anywhere near that limit. Not unless we are completely mad.
Also, we need to think about and discuss the degree of "fairness" with which this limited number of straws should be allocated amongst Earth's 6 (soon 7-9) billion human inhabitants, because allowing the amoral, market-based free-for-all we have at the moment to continue is taking us inexorably towards catastrophe.
|
||
|