To:
letters@nytimes.com |
|
|
|
Dear
Editor,
Most of those who say they "believe" in evolution do so as an act of faith in the authority of scientific consensus. To do so on the strength of one's own knowledge and understanding of the scientific data requires a good deal of study and thought, as well as an intellegent and inquisitive mind.
In
the Middle
Ages many
uneducated
people still believed in a
flat Earth,
despite most
educated
people
accepting
since ancient
times that it
was in fact a
sphere -
located
motionless at
the centre of
the universe,
of course.
European
mariners
provided more
tangiable
proof of the
Earth's shape
by sailing
around it, and
nowadays we
can fly around
it ourselves
and even have
photographs
of it taken from space.
Whether anyone
will ever come
up with such
tangiable
evidence for
evolution is
doubtful.
Doubt and uncertainty are part of the scientific spirit. For most of us (including scientists outside their own sphere of competence) it is, to some extent and necessarily, a question of whom we choose to put our faith in: those who claim to know truth as revealed in or suggested by holy scripture (or a pet scientific theory), or those who seek to approach it by studying nature with an open and sceptical mind, knowing that absolute truth and certainty are not for mortals to possess. The articles that prompted the above response: "Teaching of Creationism Is Endorsed in New Survey"; "Show Me the Science".
|
|