To: letters@nytimes.com
Re: Understanding Exxon's attitude to global warming Date: Wed, 28 May 2003 |
Dear Sir/Madam,
There is
a very (and I mean VERY)
important lesson to be learned from Exxon's
attitude to global warming
(Exxon
Backs Groups That Question
Global Warming, May 28,
2003). NO ONE
wants their business,
their means of making a
living (money) - whether
through their own work
(from shop floor to top
management) or investments
- spoiled. Every
individual, company and
industry vigorously
defends their freedom to
conduct the business they
make their money from.
It's the most natural and
accepted thing in the
world and a basic
assumption underlying our
economy and way of life,
yet it has resulted in the
tobacco, pharmaceutical
and oil industries, for
example, being accused of
putting their business
interests before the vital
interests of present and
future generations of
human beings. We
struggle to understand how
dealers in hard drugs have
the heart to give their
pernicious and illegal
business interests
priority over the immense
human suffering they
cause, and fail to see the
common values and
attitudes underlying all
business (money making)
activity, whether legal or
not. We have
known for decades about
the terrible harm
cigarettes do to human
health and life
expectancy, yet the
tobacco industry continues
to spend billions of
dollars promoting its
products and resisting all
efforts to restrict its
business. Because to them,
as with everyone, their
business interests take
priority over everything
else. In the same way, the
oil industry, and Exxon in
particular, is far more
interested in conducting
its business (selling oil
and its products) than in
the consequences of consuming
limited natural resources
so quickly or of global
warming. And the same
applies across the board
to every individual,
company and industry. Despite
differences in the way
individual people and
companies (never or rarely
whole industries) respond
to criticism of the
consequences of their
business activities, they
invariably continue to put
these interests FIRST.
They have to. Other people
(who depend on them) and
"The System"
demand it !! There is
no denying it (although
that is what everyone,
including YOU at the NYT,
are doing): the American
way of life and doing
business (i.e. all western
civilisation) is under
dire threat - from
ITSELF!! I've
already well overstepped
the maximum of 150 words
you stipulate for letters
to the editor, so I'll
write just a few
concluding words. Ideally
I'd like to write a full
article for you on the
subject. What were James Lovell's immortal words after an explosion seriously damaged Apollo 13's life-support systems? "Houston, we have a problem . . . ". We also have a problem on our very large but nevertheless finite and vulnerable planet, Spaceship Earth. If we don't start facing up to it very soon (and here the NYT has an extremely important role to play) we are going to be in more than just serious trouble; the horrors of the 20th Century will pale in comparison. Because of differences in scale, what took just seconds to become apparent on board Apollo 13 is taking years on Spaceship Earth, but the signs, such as global warming, are clear enough, for those with eyes to see.
|