To:
letters@guardian.co.uk |
Dear
Sir/Madam,
I
watched the concluding
episode of David
Attenborough’s “Life
of Mammals” on BBC1 the
other evening. It dealt
with the great apes, and
in particular, the
greatest ape of all, human
kind, and I was looking
forward to hearing what
Britain’s most eminent
zoologist would have to
say about man’s
situation on our
imperilled planet,
Spaceship Earth. I was
expecting him to tell us
how modern man’s
economic activities and
materialistic lifestyles
are threatening the
survival of
countless plant and animal
species, including his own, but was
disappointed. He refers to
the warning example of
Maya civilisation in
Central America, which had
flourished 1300 years ago,
before disintegrating,
probably because it
exhausted the productivity
of the countryside on
which it depended, but he
then went on to paint a
glorious picture of modern
man’s supreme
intelligence and
technological
achievements, leaving no
doubt that these products
of his very large brain,
projected into the future
and even involving the
colonisation of other
planets, will ensure our
survival. He
concludes in sagacious
pose, telling viewers that
up until now man has used
his burgeoning brain to
control the environment
for the benefit of the
population but that now it
is perhaps time to reverse
the process and for him to
control the population to
allow the survival of the
environment. Disappointingly,
Britain’s best known
zoologist, doesn’t seem
to have a clue as to the
true, dangerous situation
into which our species has
got itself, but instead
points to overpopulation
as the major threat. Overpopulation
is a problem, but it is
not our major problem. Certainly,
our planet can only
support a limited number
of its greatest apes.
However, whether this
limit is nearer 2 billion
or 10 billion all depends
on their economic activity
and lifestyles. If they
all want a lifestyle
which, like that of David
Attenborough’s and many
other affluent people,
places a far greater per
capita strain on our
planet’s finite
resources and carrying
capacity than it can
currently sustain, the
number is liable to be
closer to 2 billion. Despite
all his knowledge of
animal behaviour,
“David” fails to
appreciate the
implications of human
animal nature and
behaviour for the future
of our planet and the
survival of our species. The reason that capitalism and our free market economy work so well is because they are very largely based on our animal nature, exploiting our primitive human fears, desires, competitiveness, and eagerness for a bargain or “free lunch”. Our
major problem – the one
threatening the survival
of our civilisation and
perhaps even of our
species - is that our
planet has limited
resources and a finite
carrying capacity, while
the ever increasing
demands placed on it by
our economy and lifestyles
are insatiable. Unfortunately, we don’t only use our big brain to solve difficult problems; we also use it to rationalise behaviour that stems from our more primitive nature, even when it contradicts reason and can be seen - by an unconditioned eye - to be leading us towards disaster. For example, when we plunder our planet’s finite resources and disrupt its climate and life-supporting ecosystem in pursuit of perpetual economic growth and non-sustainable lifestyles.
|