To: Independent@telegraph.co.uk
Re: The corrupting influence of commercialism Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2003 |
||
|
||
Dear Sir/Madam,
Thank you for Paul
Waugh’s review of the
BBC’s new Politics Show.
I’d been thoroughly put off
by the flippant promotional
clips I’d seen, but, like
the author, wanted to give it
the benefit of the doubt. I
watched the first 5 minutes
before turning it off. Although
failing to
understand the importance
attributed to the absence of
ties, the review confirmed my brief
impression, and that I was
right not to waste my time
watching any more (First
Sight: Politics Show, BBC1, 3
February 2003). I have
returned relatively recently from living on the
continent, where I only had
access to Sky News and CNN via
satellite and pined for the
“good-old" BBC. Although I’m
English, I much preferred CNN
to Sky News, but there was
something about both of them
that I hated. I find it hard
to describe exactly what it
was, but at its core were
trivialisation and commercialism, the fact that
they were always trying to
sell something.
“Infotainment”, I think,
is the word that has been
coined to describe it. They
cannot offer you something in
a sober, informative fashion;
it has to be jazzed up and
impressed, if not physically
forced, on you. The best (i.e.
worst) examples are when they
show a promotional clip for
one of their own programmes
(be it a film, documentary, or
whatever - especially
“sports coverage”). I found it absolutely repulsive and longed for the serious, grown-up attitude of the BBC. But what did I find on arriving home and turning on the box? That the BBC has changed its mature style and followed the nauseatingly superficial, "sell-it-to-'em" example of the commercial TV stations. I do not pay a TV
licence, and I wouldn’t –
out of principle. I’d rather
go to prison! It is not just the
media that are being
thoroughly corrupted by
commercialism, but virtually
everything.
Over the years it has
become worse and worse, and is
so all-encompassing that we
barely notice it. Occasionally
it is noticed - and lamented -
but it is quickly forgotten
and ceases to be noticed
because it is so normal and
taken for granted. Just one other
example I’ve noticed in
today’s press is the
trivialisation and
commercialisation (the two
almost invariably to go
together) of the Glencoe
Massacre.
One wonders how long it
will be before the same is
done with the gas chambers of
Auschwitz . . . Commerce has always
been at the very centre of
civilisation, but today’s
commercialism will be our
undoing - unless we come to
grips with it soon. We have already gone
a long way down a road which
is leading us towards disaster, but it is not too
late to call a halt and change
direction – or at least to
start thinking about it. Most people are still unaware of the magnitude and imminence of the threat, or of the fundamental changes that must be made to our values, attitudes and aspirations, and the economy and lifestyles they engender, if disaster is to be averted and our children are to have any hope of a happy and prosperous future. Daily
Telegraph: |